>> This APPEARS to be on the US DOJ site.
>> Either the whole site is fake (which may be) or =E2=80=A6

> The whole, but not in a sense of web ;-)
> Look, from the point of unbiased justice any accusation must be
> followed by evidence. They even did not bother showing original
> doc, not to say about the person.

Their aim is not to convince you with this exerpt alone. See below.

> Moreover, they wrote: "The manual was found in a computer file"
> and  "The manual was translated into English" May I ask why they
> chose that kind of a font. The font inflates 30K text up to 1M pdf.
> I doubt the bandits would like very much using 1M files instead of
> 30K like Microchip with their XMbyte pdfs. It seems the font was
> intended to give the impression of the doc being a super-secret
> classified doc.
> Hell, what morons is this show intended for?

Either the manual is false or genuine.
If genuine, then font used etc are not overly relevant to the=20
contents.
The font gves the appearance of having been typewritten. It's just=20
possible that it was ! (but unlikely).
>From hat they say, this translation was evidence for a trial, and=20
there may be standard formats for presentation based on the arcane=20
ways of lawyers and the legal system. IANAL (fortunately :-) ) so I=20
can't say.

IF it was evidence for a trial then the legal system would have had=20
requirements for proof of authenticity of the original, the goodness=20
of the translation etc - that's, amongst other things, is what defence=20
counsel are for. All that is outside the scope of the content.

IF it is a real DOJ site (as it seems to be) then the manual is=20
"reasonably likely" to be genuinely what it claims to be.
If so, then the content is of far more interest to me than the fond=20
they chose to use when it was translated or the files size etc.

The main point (and the reason that the DOJ placed it on a web site),=20
is that there are devious nasty people amongst us who wish us ill for=20
whatever reasons. Even if they must spell out the obvious in their=20
"training manuals". Presumably the parts that they note have been=20
omitted contain more interesting material about how to do damage.



        RM.

.=20

--=20
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist