> I have heard of similar things in the past.  Wealthy audiophiles
> will spend almost anything to get that extra .00001% of audio
> quality out of their system.

But you can't get there from here :-).
ie at the level they are trying to get down to the effects of other 
factors which aren't being taken into account will swamp any 
improvements that may exist. And at some stage you surpass the 
available quality that is present in the media by such a margin that 
any further improvement gains about nothing. And at some stage you 
surpass the quality available in your own audio input transducers - 
sooner or later someone is going to provide direct neural input for 
the richer masses - until then the practical limit has already been 
exceeded.

Direct neural input MAY not be all that hard using direct induction in 
some form. Worth a thought (pun almost intended).



        RM


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist