Try wizC from www.fored.co.uk
Great compiler, great debugging and simulation capabilities.
Very affordable and very affordable support (only needed if you want=20
guaranteed responsetimes)

Marcel

Alex Parkinson wrote:
> Similarly, we're considering buying a C compiler, as well. I've demoed =
all=20
> of the
> compilers I could find, and I liked the Hi-Tech compiler best (most=20
> compact code, easy
> to use).  It's pretty expensive, however.  What are your opinions on th=
e=20
> less expensive
> c compilers, like CCS, C2C/BoostC, CC5X/CC8E, and any others I've left=20
> out?
>
> Alex
>
> M=E1rcio Barbiani wrote:
>>> My organization is considering purchasing a new PicBasic compiler, an=
d
>>> I wanted to get some feedback regarding the relative advantages and
>>> disadvantages (code size/speed, features, etc.) of the various
>>> compilers. We're currently using ME Labs PicBasic Pro v2.43 and are
>>> considering the Proton+ compiler from Crownhill Associates. Does
>>> anyone have experience with these which they could share?
>>
>>
>> Proton+ is very nice, their new version is much better than the old.
>>
>> When I started with Pic's it was with Proton+, I used it until the poi=
nt
>> that the problems
>> with interrupts (asm/basic) made me switch to C.
>>
>> If I would buy a new compiler now, it would be CCS C compiler.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
>> View/change your membership options at
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist=20

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist