Similarly, we're considering buying a C compiler, as well. I've demoed al=
l of the=20
compilers I could find, and I liked the Hi-Tech compiler best (most compa=
ct code, easy=20
to use).  It's pretty expensive, however.  What are your opinions on the =
less expensive=20
c compilers, like CCS, C2C/BoostC, CC5X/CC8E, and any others I've left ou=
t?

Alex

M=E1rcio Barbiani wrote:
>> My organization is considering purchasing a new PicBasic compiler, and=
=20
>> I wanted to get some feedback regarding the relative advantages and=20
>> disadvantages (code size/speed, features, etc.) of the various=20
>> compilers. We're currently using ME Labs PicBasic Pro v2.43 and are=20
>> considering the Proton+ compiler from Crownhill Associates. Does=20
>> anyone have experience with these which they could share?
>=20
>=20
> Proton+ is very nice, their new version is much better than the old.
>=20
> When I started with Pic's it was with Proton+, I used it until the poin=
t=20
> that the problems
> with interrupts (asm/basic) made me switch to C.
>=20
> If I would buy a new compiler now, it would be CCS C compiler.
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>=20
>=20


--=20
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.4 - Release Date: 12/15/2004

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist