On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 09:39 +0000, Michael Rigby-Jones wrote:
> Although in this case it is correct, to my mind it takes a leap of faith
> to implicitly belive the MPLAB simulator results in poorly documented
> situations like this.  It does have a history of small timing
> inaccuracies.

I also wouldn't blindly trust MPLABs sim, but as you mention in this
case it proved correct. FWIW if MPLAB sim starts to produce "odd" things
I usually go to the ICD2, the real chip will behave in the way the real
chip will behave! :) TTYL

-----------------------------
Herbert's PIC Stuff:
http://repatch.dyndns.org:8383/pic_stuff/

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist