>In a prior thread on this list, it was
>mentioned that FAT12 was license free,
>but who is going to use only 2MB of storage?

I thought that the conclusion was that Microsoft could not claim rights to
the FAT file system, but that the patent was for using long file names on
FAT. I am certainly under the impression that FAT16 is license free.

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist