> subtle distinctions like whether such a science is actually a 
> science, and if so, why, are usually considered heretic.

I always love to be a heretic for a good cause!

I don't object to taking the disciplines you mention serious, but they
should not be grouped in the same category as the hard scieces. Call
them weak sciences, or call the real ones hard sciences, but don't mix
them. And note that a (small) part of medicine, sociology etc. actually
*is* (hard) science. And last: don't call mathematics science, it is
something different alltogether.

I was always opposed to calling the education I enjoyed 'computer
science'. There are some scientific corners in it, and some more
matematics, but most of it is just craftmanship. Usefull in its own way
of course, but not science.

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products
docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
 


_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist