Hi. One of the five lines I need to convert is a data clock, but it's about 1kHz, so hopefully, this won't be a problem. I'll check out the hex buffers though, thanks for the suggestion Regards, Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu > [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu]On Behalf > Of Jake Anderson > Sent: 03 December 2004 13:07 > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > Subject: RE: [EE]Darlingon array, was Will this voltage > shifter work for > m y application? > > > just a caution and a suggestion to boot > if you are trying to send high speed data you will want a > fairly "strong" > pull up depending on signal length. > > capacitive and inductive effects mean that it may take the > line a while to > rise from a low to a high. > I had a similar problem with a level converter. > I was running from 3.3v to 5V SPI, over about 20cm of cord > (the cord had the > 5v signal on it), I just used a TTL hex buffer. > its high threshold was around 2 and a bit volts and the > dataflash had a > minimum output of 3 > > other upside is 6 converters in one chip ;-> > > I was running that at ~62KHZ I think > 20mhz 16F877 at fosc/64 SPI > resistor divider down converter and the buffer back up. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu > [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu]On Behalf > > Of Russell McMahon > > Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 23:06 > > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > > Subject: Re: [EE]Darlingon array, was Will this voltage > shifter work for > > m y application? > > > > > > > Thinking about the OpAmp solution, wouldn't a comparator be even > > > better/more > > > suited to my application? > > > LM339 quad would do the trick, (or rather a pair of them > - I need 5 > > > comparators - bugger!) > > > > > > I assume the LM339 can switch at 1kHz comfortably? > > > > LM339 is a technically superior solution BUT, unlike the L:M324 > > which drives > > high actively, all its comparators are "open collector" > output so need a > > pullup resistor. using Dave Minklers suggestion of using pullups > > on the PIC > > you could do it with no external pullups. > > > > > You mention a decoupling capacitor on the supply. I am using > > an LM317LZ > > > vreg > > > to provide regulated 5v, from a 12v DC input (& another for > > 1.5v) for PIC > > > and > > > possibly now the LM339, which has a 0.1uF(IIRC) capacitor > on the output > > > already - so will I still need a further decoupling capacitor > > for the IC? > > > > A 0.1 uF for each IC between its power supply pins is usually a > > good idea. > > Not always essential - but it's a shame to have things fail due > > to excessive > > noise for want of a cap worth a few cents. > > > > > > RM > > > > _______________________________________________ > > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > ============================================================================== This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its network. Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB until they are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be secure. ============================================================================== _______________________________________________ http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist