Ken Pergola wrote :

> Simon Dyer wrote:
> 
> > What is the configuration word mistake you refer to?
> 
> We recently had a thread about this. Jan-Erik Soderholm and 
> Olin Lathrop mentioned that the linker script files for the
> PIC10F contain the wrong address for the configuration word
>  -- a mistake...

Hi.

Well, this morning I'm not that sure about that anymore...

The "PIC10F200/202/204/206, Memory Programming
Specification", document DS41228D says :

"Note: By convention the Configuration Word
 register is stored at the logical address
 location of 0xFFF within the hex file generated
 for the PIC10F200/202/204/206. This
 logical address location may not reflect the
 actual physical address for the part itself.
 It is the responsibility of the programming
 software to retrieve the Configuration 
 Word register from the logical address
 within the hex file and translate the
 address to the proper physical location
 when programming."

Personaly, I hadn't seen that before, and it seems
to clear out this issue, doesn't it  ?

Best Regards,
Jan-Erik.

PS: The question about wheither this is good or bad
design, is a totaly different question, IMHO...
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist