Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
> so could anyone see if the adresses
> in the HEX file below are correct ?

No.  The HEX file contains FEBh at addresses 1FFEh,1FFFh, which translates
to address FFFh in the PIC.  FEBh is correct if you want RB3 to function as
MCLR, code protection off, and watchdog timer disabled.  However, the config
word on these chips is at 3FFh, not FFFh.

> And, Olin, are you sying that the following
> entry in the 10F202.LKR file is incorrect ?
>
> CODEPAGE   NAME=.config  START=0xFFF   END=0xFFF     PROTECTED

Yes.

> That is, it should be "START=0x3FF   END=0x3FF" !?
>
> All four LKR files (200/202/204/206) have "0xFFF" at that line.

That should tell you its a bug right there.  Even if the addresses were
somehow mapped strangely to the HEX file, they would still need to be
different between the 200/204 and 202/206.  The 200/204 have the config word
at 1FFh.

As I said before, MPLAB has known bugs relating to config words and 10Fs.  I
have used my own linker files, avoided the __CONFIG directive, and
everything worked fine.


*****************************************************************
Embed Inc, embedded system specialists in Littleton Massachusetts
(978) 742-9014, http://www.embedinc.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist