Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:

>Justin Fielding wrote :
>
>  
>
>>Seriously though, this is a serious issue, and digital signing
>>is not something which people should have to disable for
>>mailing lists etc.
>>    
>>
>
>Why not just *enable* digital signing whenever you (and the
>receivers !) realy *need* it ?
>  
>
That's like saying that you should only lock your car when you know 
somebody is going to steal it!

>Does anyone else on the PIClist have digital signing enabled
>(when posting)  ?
>  
>
I have seen a few people using PGP type inline signing.  I don't relly 
like this too much as it's messy for users who do not have PGP/GPG 
functions in their mail client.

>Jan-Erik.
>
>_______________________________________________
>http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
>View/change your membership options at
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
>  
>
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist