Agreed - I have become rather used to the PIC, and have a lot
of hardware and time invested in working with it, so climbing=20
the learning curve on the AVRs hasn't  been really worth it to=20
me -- so far.  I suppose that could change is there were to be
a "killer app" that would only work on AVRs.

Roy J. Gromlich

-----------Dave VanHorn said ----------------

VBG  I would tend to agree.
No "holes", no "pages".
Also, 16 "W" register equivalents, and 16 more near equivalents, makes =
for=20
faster code.
Many things can be kept in the registers and modified directly, instead =
of=20
load from SRAM, modify, and store.

They've always had vectored interrupts as well.

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist