On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 11:11, Alan B. Pearce wrote:
> >I'm not sure if this sort of stuff is "illegal", but
> >I think the lawyers noticed that it wasn't very cut
> >and dry and taking it out was probably the better move.
> 
> Probably a case of "if there is too much un-enforceable guff in there, the
> judge is likely to throw out a case with looking closely, but if it is
> something like reasonable then it is easier to enforce"

My thoughts exactly. TTYL
 
-----------------------------
Herbert's PIC Stuff:
http://repatch.dyndns.org:8383/pic_stuff/

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist