--===============24087749689886184==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1482132.sAqPoCM50P";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart1482132.sAqPoCM50P
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 10 November 2004 17:09, Michael Rigby-Jones wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >Shawn Tan Ser Ngiap wrote:
> >>It has the same performance as the old 232BM FTDI chips.. Hey, I'm
> >>interested
> >>to find out if anyone knows if we can use the newer FT2232C
> >
> >to effectively
> >
> >>double our bandwidth??
> >
> >If a chip like this converts from the PIC UART to USB, how can you
> >increase the bandwidth? It would seem to me that it would still be
> >limited by the speed of the UART. Would you just output on more pins
> >than the PIC's default TX/RX?
> >
> >Awaiting enlightenment,
> >Ian
>
> You are limited by the speed of the PIC's USART, but that's not generaly
> the issue.  These devices are about allowing USB connectivity with minimal
> hassle.

Yeah... that's right!!.. but if we could have 2 uarts on a PIC, then, we co=
uld=20
effectively double our comm bandwidth with some clever software yes?? The=20
next question is whether there are any multi-uart PICs out there..

=2D-=20
with metta,
Shawn Tan


--nextPart1482132.sAqPoCM50P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBkmaHUgUYbQRKphMRAq8/AKCXBiBPXUvc2PtU8rEWRnQWaDMf5wCdHPno
BPqWqjrSBt+Tl/SdxJHPrwM=
=6cY1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1482132.sAqPoCM50P--

--===============24087749689886184==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

--===============24087749689886184==--