If the bootloader is capable of addressing bytes to change
a field update can be applied without sending the entire object code.
And of course somewhere in the process part of the 128bit # gets changed
so the password will be different for each subsequent update.

KF4HAZ - Lonnie

----- From: "Wouter van Ooijen" <wouter@

> > How about one that must see a 128 bit number within the first 
> 
> Sorry, I should have been more specific: I have never seen a bootloading
> scheme that can safely (= without relealing the (new) code) work in the
> client's context. Whether that is still relevant to the discussion is to
> be determined :)
> 
> Wouter van Ooijen
> 
> -- -------------------------------------------
> Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
> consultancy, development, PICmicro products
> docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist