Jose Da Silva wrote :

> > I was just asking why that whould "come out horrible
> > on a PIC".
> 
> I was thinking of a certain x86 processor...

Sorry, I just read "PIC" and thought you ment that.

> Basically, call that statement I made earlier, a mistake on my part.
> I shouldn't apply large ideas to a PIC...

Part of my point (not perfectly clear, yes :-) ) was that the term "PIC"
is a bit to generic. It's big differences between the PIC16-line and
the PIC18-line when it comes to "table handling" and "indexed addressing".

> BTW, since you're hanging on that statement ready to pound it 
> into the ground,...

You're probably right... :-) :-)
Let's go on.

[EOT]

Regards,
Jan-Erik.
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist