On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 23:29, Peter van Hoof wrote:
> I feel like i should shut up about it already I sense aggrevation but one 
> thought about it I want to share.
> We already use tags so people can filter messages how about an additional 
> tag.
> If there is the option in the mailman software we could use server side 
> filtering for members that desire not to receive possible objective 
> materials. or if this is not possible at least we offer a filterable tag.

That would at least give the impression that the piclist is a place FOR
objectionable material. This is NOT a route we want to follow, ignoring
the huge bandwidth flame wars produce (remember, bandwidth is donated to
us, the more we appear on "the radar" the more risk we have of loosing
everything).

Aside from this, as an admin I HAVE to read all messages, and I do NOT
want to read the sort of crap that "objectionable" produces (observe the
rant that came out of a poster after Olin's more interesting posts).

-----------------------------
Herbert's PIC Stuff:
http://repatch.dyndns.org:8383/pic_stuff/

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist