That's probably it. I use MPLAB's standard environment.It doesn't matter 
now, this morning
I found out I only need 8 bits, and I'd written a fast one (31-cycles 
max) sometime back.

--Bob

Olin Lathrop wrote:

>Bob Axtell wrote:
>  
>
>>>Oops!  The "17th bit" from the last iteration should actually be the
>>>high bit of the remainder, which becomes a digit value.
>>>
>>>Fortunately the fix was as simple as changing the mask for the valid
>>>remainder bits to not throw out the high bit.  All the statistics are
>>>therefore still the same: 847 cycles and 30 program memory locations
>>>if REG0 - REG3 are trashed, 879 cycles and 65 program memory
>>>locations if all registers are restored by the subroutine.  I have
>>>attached the updated code, which includes test cases with 8s and 9s
>>>in the result.
>>>      
>>>
>>Even after this change, I never got this to work, Olin.Its a great
>>idea.
>>Is there a later version?
>>    
>>
>
>It works fine for me, including all the test cases in the source code.  In
>what way could you not get it to work?  Is it a problem of building my
>source code because it needs my PIC development environment?
>
>
>*****************************************************************
>Embed Inc, embedded system specialists in Littleton Massachusetts
>(978) 742-9014, http://www.embedinc.com
>_______________________________________________
>http://www.piclist.com
>View/change your membership options at
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
>
>  
>


-- 
Note: Attachments must be sent to
 attach@engineer.cotse.net, and 
 MAY delay replies to this message.
        520-219-2363

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist