This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --===============99364038757617534== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C48F62.CC58D11A" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C48F62.CC58D11A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" piclist-bounces@mit.edu wrote: > Despite nay sayers on this list, the change IS coming. The article > contains significant comment by large US manufacturers. The change is happening right now. some components are already shipping with a Pb-free finish. Some manufacturers will not even identify the change with a new PN. So it will affect everyone in some way or another, since you will be able to buy only Pb-free components. My understanding is that Pb-free components are chemically compatible with SnPb solders, BUT you still need higher reflow temperatures or the the yield & reliability suffers. Anyone have any comments? ------_=_NextPart_001_01C48F62.CC58D11A Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
piclist-bounces@mit.edu wrote:
> Despite nay sayers on this list, the change IS coming. The article
> contains significant comment by large US manufacturers.
The change is happening right now. some components are already shipping
with a Pb-free finish. Some manufacturers will not even identify the
change with a new PN. So it will affect everyone in some way or another,
since you will be able to buy only Pb-free components. My understanding
is that Pb-free components are chemically compatible with SnPb solders,
BUT you still need higher reflow temperatures or the the yield &
reliability suffers. Anyone have any comments?