O.K let me get this right:
1. create a delay routine of 0.1s i.e delsy_0.1s

call delay_0.1s
call delay_0.1s
..
..
..
repeat this 74 times

I am sorry for my ignorant but that's my understanding of calling 0.1s delay
74 times.
Am I right or made a fool of myself.



> > Mauricio wrote:
> >
> > >You call Delay1
> > > Delay1 calls delay2 ---> You need different registers for
> > > delay1 and delay2
> > and
> > >You call Delay1
> > >You call Delay2 ---> You can use the same registers for both delays.
> >
> > I went with the second option.It works perfect apart from the very last
>
>I would have gone (and generally do) with the first. Make a 0.2s delay
>and call it X times to get a longer one. eg call delay_0.2s 74 times to get
>14.8s. You still need only 3 RAM registers. d1/d2 for the 0.2s routine
>and d3 to count calls. Makes it much easier to change or add a delay
>without having to work out instruction cycles
>
>Your Delay_14.8s routine runs for 14.80000s at 4MHz BTW (according
>to an MPLAB simulation)
>
>Also, it's good practise to put at least one NOP between those bcfs and
>bsfs on the port pins
>
>http://www.piclist.com/techref/readmodwrite.htm
>
>Driving LEDs, probably not a problem but it pays to eliminate any
>possibility
>
>--
>http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
>email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body