Jinx wrote :

> I would have gone (and generally do) with the first. Make a 0.2s delay
> and call it X times to get a longer one. eg call delay_0.2s
> 74 times to get 14.8s.

The problem was that he also needed a 0.5 s delay, so I'd selected
a "base" delay of 0.1s, since all delays then would have been an
integer multiple of this base delay...

Jan-Erik.

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body