I Get your point. I will have a look at the alternatives. Thank you!

/Ake

Wouter van Ooijen wrote:

>>For me a *class* or a *file* implementing some kind of
>>functionality  is
>>the same as a library in the form of a Unix DL or Windows DLL or a
>>compiler dynamic linked library. So I interpret  LGPL so that
>>it is OK
>>to use this code in a propritary application without
>>releasing other code.
>>   =20
>>
>
>You can of course interpret any text in any way you want, but the LGPL
>wording is very precise in its distinction between static and dynamic
>linking. And for someone to feel safe to use your code it is the legal
>wording that is important, not your stated interpretation of it.
>
>But again, if the aim is to increase the volume of free software GPL (or
>sometimes LGPL) is the correct choice, if the aim is to support the use
>of VSCP something like zlib, artistic, bds, etc. is more approriate.
>
>Wouter van Ooijen
>
>-- -------------------------------------------
>Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
>consultancy, development, PICmicro products
>
>--
>http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
>ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.
>
> =20
>


--=20
 ---
Ake Hedman (YAP - Yet Another Programmer)
eurosource, Brattbergav=E4gen 17, 820 50 LOS, Sweden
Phone: (46) 657 413430 Cellular: (46) 73 84 84 102
Company home: http://www.eurosource.se     =20
Kryddor/Te/Kaffe: http://www.brattberg.com
Personal homepage: http://www.eurosource.se/akhe
Automated home: http://www.vscp.org


--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body