OK BAJ, I re-read the LGPL one more time :)

So I backtrack my objections to LGPL-ed embedded libraries to the fact
that you can not use such a library to create a realy closed
pay-per-chip product.

Note that as author of a library that is exactly what you might want to
prevent, it that case (L)GPL is a perfect license for your library. But
when you want to promote a concept like a communication protocol I still
hold that a more premissive license will promote the concept better (at
the cost of making the downstream product less free).

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body