On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Engineering Info wrote:

> Yes, I agree that 2 I/O would be better and I can think of a whole lot
> more applications with a 40 pin part also.  The point I'm trying to make
> is that just cause a processor may only have 2, 3, or 4 pins doesn't
> mean there isn't anything that they can be used for.  Their limit is
> only in your imagination.  I predict that it will only be a matter of
> time before a 3 pin PIC processor is available.

So why not just cut 3 of the pins off from a SOT-23 pic 10F?

Bill

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics