Tom, It was done with a combination of Switching and linear regulation. Also, the switching frequency of the switching regulator is >1Mhz. This allows for small components and easier filtering. There is a common mode choke used. Plus the transformers are part of the filter circuit. Beyond that, I can't say much more. As far as measuring the noise floor, we used a SRS Spectrum analyzer. Regards, Jim > Jim, > > If you don't mind giving away some secrets, what was the general method > you used to achieve these numbers? Not looking for schematics or > anything, just curious how you could get a switcher so quiet. > > And also, how did you verify the -140db? It seems to me not a trivial > achievment. > > Tom > > At 02:41 PM 6/25/04 +0500, you wrote: >> Lawrence, >> >> I agree 100% from a regulation standpoint. But from a noise >> perspective, you'd be hard put to gain the same performance from such >> inexpensive hardware. We have spent many manhours designing a power >> supply for a system we designed and build. The noise performance for >> this system is around the -140+ (or should that be minus for lower >> noise)db range. This is not easily achieved by weither a linear type >> regulator or a switching type regulator. We have achieved a small >> switching supply that has an input range of about 3 VDC to about 18 >> VDC with an output of plus and minus 5 AVDC @ ~200ma (each leg). And >> this with a noise figure of better than -140db. Not easily achieved, >> and not inexpensive, but doable. >> >> But as a practical matter, your design is sufficient for most lab uses >> you will probably run into in general work. But if you have to have >> a very quiet supply, figure on spending a few more bucks than this. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jim > > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: > [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads -- http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic: [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads