First of all resonate the primary coil by adjusting the series cap value. george ----- Original Message ----- From: "John N. Power" To: Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 10:45 PM Subject: Re: ] Magnetic fields > > From: Shawn Wilton[SMTP:shawn@BLACK9.NET] > > Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 12:08 AM > > To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU > > Subject: [ee:] Magnetic fields > > > Has anyone done anything like this app note: > > http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/AppNotes/00232a.pdf > > > I'm trying to do something similar to this, but I just want to be able > > to detect a field from about 3 feet away. But I can't get the darn > > circuit to produce a strong enough field in the first place. > > > What I'm doing is this: > > > I have a simple "transmitter" that consists of a 160uH loop connected in > > series with a microchip T4422 fet driver running at 12 volts (7812 and > > 10pF caps) and a .1uf 100 volt capacitor. > > > I'm trying to detect the field with another loop probably about 50uH but > > much larger radius and my DMM. I can pick up a frequency change by > > getting closer, but I can't pick up any voltage just current in the 1-3 > > mA range. > > > Any ideas, comments, suggestions, discussion welcome. > > -- > > > > Shawn Wilton > > Junior in CpE > > MicroBiologist > > > Phone: (503) 881-2707 > > Email: shawn@black9.net > > > http://black9.net > > The coupling between two current carrying coils can be visualized > as the sum of the coupling between each differential current element > of the source coil and each differential current element of the > receiver. This coupling decreases with distance and with angular > rotation of the receiver with respect to the sender. Maximum coupling > occurs if the source and receiver are parallel. > > Because of the first condition, the differential elements of the receiver > which contribute the most are those which are closest to the sending > differential element. This means that the best shape and size for the > receiver coil is that which matches the sender (same size and shape). > Making the receiver coil larger than the sender increases the distance > between each source element and its closest element on the receiver. > Essentially, the coils couple through their perimeters. Matching size > and shape decreases the integrated distance for a given coil spacing. > > The second condition controls how much of the receiver coil responds > to a given element on the sender. If the coils are circular, the receiver > element closest to the sending element will be parallel to the sender. > As you move farther along the receiver coil, the elements not only > become farther away, but they are also rotated, which further > decreases the coupling. If the coils are rectangular, the rotational > effect does not take place, in principle increasing the output > somewhat. > > The induction field produced by current flowing through a coil > falls off faster than 1 over r squared. To compensate, you need > some serious current in the source coil. > > John Power > > -- > http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! > email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body > -- http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu