I saw this sort of scheme yesterday, as I said. The "trickery" that was used was simply only turning on one LED at a time. In the example I've seen, this is how it's done ----+ +----------------------------------------+ | | +------------------------------+ | | | | +--------------------+ | | | | | | +----------+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | \ \ \ \ | | | | | / / / / | | | | | \ \ \ \ | | | | | / / / / | | | | | \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +---+ +---+ +---+ MCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ___ | ___ | ___ | | | | | | | \ / | \ / | \ / | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | Pin1|-------+--------------+-------+-------+---- | | | | | | | | | | | | +---+ | +---+ +---+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ___ | | ___ | ___ | | | | | \ / | | \ / | \ / | | | | | --- | | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | Pin2|-----+--------+---------------+-------+---- | | | | | | | | | | +---+ +---+ | +---+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | ___ | ___ | | ___ | | | | \ / | \ / | | \ / | | | | --- | --- | | --- | | | | | | | | | | | Pin3|---+----------+-------+---------------+---- | | | | | | | | +---+ +---+ +---+ | | | | | | | | | | | | ___ | ___ | ___ | | | | \ / | \ / | \ / | | | | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | Pin4|-+------------+-------+-------+------------ ----- Original Message ----- From: Wouter van Ooijen Date: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:31 pm Subject: Re: N*(N-1) LEDs on N pins > > I multiplex by N-1 LEDs. Some trickery is needed because the current > through the 'on' LEDs depends on the number of on LEDs. > > Wouter van Ooijen > > -- ------------------------------------------- > Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl > consultancy, development, PICmicro products > > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics > (like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics > -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics (like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics