He's saying use hardware instead of software.



Lindy Mayfield wrote:

>>6. This is the tough one, and I'll probably get some flak over
>>it: whenever possible, use hardware resources to get things
>> done.
>
>
>>BAJ
>
>
> All the things you wrote are great and good advice.  I just wonder, why would anyone give you flak over this?  Am I understanding things correctly?  You're saying that using the on-chip USART is preferential to big-banging it?
>
> If this is correct, I rack my brain trying to think of any advantages bit-banging on a PIC would have over an on-chip USART.  What am I missing?
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.699 / Virus Database: 456 - Release Date: 6/4/2004
>
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
> [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads