>=20
> 6. This is the tough one, and I'll probably get some flak over
> it: whenever possible, use hardware resources to get things=20
>  done.=20

> BAJ

All the things you wrote are great and good advice.  I just wonder, why =
would anyone give you flak over this?  Am I understanding things =
correctly?  You're saying that using the on-chip USART is preferential =
to big-banging it? =20

If this is correct, I rack my brain trying to think of any advantages =
bit-banging on a PIC would have over an on-chip USART.  What am I =
missing?



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.699 / Virus Database: 456 - Release Date: 6/4/2004
=20

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads