> Actually, the likelihood is that the DNA has no apparent affect, but is
> more than likely responsible for genetic variation.  That's how most
> "junk" dna works.

If you know all (or even most) the things that "junk DNA" does you should
publish a paper asap. There's at least 10 Nobel prizes up for grabs in that
area (but none in mathematics) :-)


        Russell McMahon

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads