You could find an old cheap laptop as the intermediary machine. It's low
power, quiet, and compact.

--
--
Martin Klingensmith
http://infoarchive.net/
http://nnytech.net/

Greg Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2004 22:59:10 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>>Well, not too bad if you keep it at DC kinds of frequencies.  Really, the
>>computer/LAN idea is a good one.  Another possibility is computer/WAP,
>>although 40 feet of CAT5 really isn't a big deal.  But the wireless is
>>probably cheaper if you have to pay someone to run the conduit.
>
>
>         Thanks for the input, I guess now at least we know not to put
> any money into it.  But we may still give it a try if we can do it
> without spending any money.
>         Our original plan was to go with the computer LAN, we have
> 10-base-T run to the scope already.  But the computer really takes up
> a lot of room in the telescope area.
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
> [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads