AFAIK they only do digital. But the support from Nordic is very promp and to the point, you could ash them. There is indeed a non-Shockburst mode in the Nordic chips (perhaps Laipac has disabled it...). So, if you combine this with some AD and DA conversion, voice might be possible. Don't live in the US, don't know the FCC rules, I guess Nordic should know this. Kevin Olalde wrote: > I've never used them, but briefly went over the datasheet as from Laipac and the > one (can't remember the number) from Nordic. There seems to be another > non-Shockburst mode that's been purposefully (and little sloppily) removed from > Laipac doc. > > I wanted to use these modules for both analog and digital (Shockburst) > datastreams. > > My idea was to use these modules for both a digital stream (home automation of > sorts), and for a type of intercom system (my thinking was that having an analog > input/output mode would make this simpler). > > Also, in the US, can I use these modules for digital and voice data (for > personal use) and not break any FCC rules? > > So, like the OP, any real world experiences on the Laipac modules? > > Thanks, > Kevin > > > Marcel van Lieshout wrote: >> >> If they talk about Shockburst, they must be using Nordic chips: www.nvlsi.no , maybe the info >> you need is in their datasheets. >> >> Marcel >> >> M. Adam Davis wrote: >>> I'm looking at using TRF-2.4G modules in the near future, I see that at >>> least two people on this list have them (Herbert, Charles?). Can you >>> give me a heads up on whether you have them running, and what pitfalls I >>> might encounter if I do use them? >>> >>> From the data sheet (just request one from Laipac - they send it very >>> quickly) I don't see anything that would give me information about >>> signal strength or noise information, so scanning channels for a clear >>> spot appears to be impossible with these. Further, it only talks about >>> its shockburst mode, and seems to indicate that you can use it in direct >>> mode but doesn't indicate how one would use that mode. >>> >>> Do you find much interference from other 2.4GHz devices? >>> Have you had any problems getting them to work, or do you just put 256 >>> bits in one side and they pop out the other side without lost packets? >>> >>> Thanks for the insight! >>> >>> -Adam -- http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body