----- Original Message ----- From: "David Koski" To: Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:50 PM Subject: Re: [OT:] NO Lead Solder after July 2006 *** Read This *** > On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:33:30 +0200 > Floret Morgenstern wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael C. Reid" > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 7:14 PM > > Subject: Re: [OT:] NO Lead Solder after July 2006 *** Read This *** > > > > > > > here is an interesting article from worldnet about weapons of mass > > > destruction in Iraq: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38213 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: pic microcontroller discussion list > > > [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU]On Behalf Of Alan B. Pearce > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 6:56 AM > > > To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU > > > Subject: Re: [OT:] NO Lead Solder after July 2006 *** Read This *** > > > > > > > > > >Have you heard anything about our political processes lately? > > > > > > Well at least you have a president who looks like they may be trying to > > say > > > "did we have the right reasons for going into Iraq". Here in the UK it is > > > still definitely the right thing to have done because they have WMD, > > despite > > > never finding any, and seemingly increasing evidence that the minions > > there > > > were hoodwinking their leader over what was available. :))) > > > > > > -- > > > > Of course there were mass destruction weapons in the Iraq, because the US > > gave it to them. > > But despite any facts, if there were or if there weren't any mass > > destructive weapons, offense is NEVER defense. > > It makes no sense to me to wait until a mad man has the power of nukes like has > happened with DPRK. I disagree. > That's the problem with ethics... the most healthy thing isn't always the right thing to do... > > Nobody had the right to attack Iraq, just because there was a hind that they > > could have had mass destructive weapons. There are many countries in the > > world with mass destruction weapons. Where would life go, if everybody would > > start an offense just for defense? > > There are a lot of "bad guys" that already do that. May be, but I think they don't claim to be one of the "good guys", despite the fact, that there's no such thing as good or bad, exspecially not in intercultural relationships. > > > So if you claim a high moral for your country, you can't attack someone, > > just because you are afraid of what he could do. > > > > Americans are hypocrites, they always say "In God we trust", but they don't > > follow some of the most important rules of christianity. > > Iraq DID atack--Kuwait. Remember? Do you remember the conditions of surrender? > > david > Although I was very young at that time, yes, I remember! But in that case it was ok that the americans HELPED Kuwait. -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.