>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alan B. Pearce [mailto:A.B.Pearce@RL.AC.UK]
>Sent: 19 April 2004 10:09
>To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: Re: [EE]: DMM reccomendation?
>
>
>>> Stay away from Agilent.
>>
>>Why?
>
>Agilent seem to have lost the plot in recent years. I don't
>have experience with their recent DMM's, but a colleague has a
>recent scope of theirs, and I much prefer my Tek TDS 2000 &
>TDS3000 series, except for the memory size. Other items from
>Agilent don't seem as nice either.
>

Interesting.

Virtualy all our test instruments are Agilent/HP and they generaly stand out
head and shoulders above the rest, both in in terms of functionality and
support.  My biggest grumble would be some of the more complex instruments
have confusing deeply nested menus which take a bit of getting used to.

Regards

Mike




=======================================================================
This e-mail is intended for the person it is addressed to only. The
information contained in it may be confidential and/or protected by
law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you must
not make any use of this information, or copy or show it to any
person. Please contact us immediately to tell us that you have
received this e-mail, and return the original to us. Any use,
forwarding, printing or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
No part of this message can be considered a request for goods or
services.
=======================================================================
Any questions about Bookham's E-Mail service should be directed to
postmaster@bookham.com.

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body