> Ok.  I don't think "registers", as mentioned in that definition, and
> "registers" as exist on things like PICs match up very well.  RISC
> usually involves memory/register move capability, with all the math and
> such happening between registers...  PIC registers don't DO that...

PIC and definitely AVR are RISC

> CISC, now; you haven't lived until you programmed a CPU that has
> machine level instructions directly supporting COBOL that execute
> somewhat more slowly than similar functions written (on the same CPU)
> in the more primitive primitives...

This I will certainly pass on.  :-)
>
> BillW
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
> mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads