Bill,

Yeah, it's a bit convoluted like that, but that's just the way that
the book I'm using taught me... The way that you put it seems a lot
neater though so I will switch to doing it that way. It seems that
my book was more interested in saving a few instructions rather
than code clarity...

Matt

On Tuesday 30 March 2004 16:33, William Bross wrote:
> Matt,
> Upon further investigation, I see that you do have the ISR at
> 0x04, albeit a bit convoluted.  As Mike mentioned, make sure you
> save w and status upon entering the ISR and you pop them back to
> their original values upon exiting the ISR.  The other thing I
> found is you are clearing INTCON bit 3 instead of bit 2 which is
> really T0IF.  I just popped your code into the simulator and
> found it in less than a minute. You really need to look at the
> include file and use the assigned names for the register bits.
> It will be a lot less confusing as you get deeper into bigger
> blocks of code.
>
> Bill

--
Matt N. Marsh
Email: matt@mattmarsh.net          Yahoo: marshmn
  Web: http://www.mattmarsh.net/  Jabber: mattmarsh@jabber.org
                                     MSN: matt@mattmarsh.net
                                     ICQ: 250467363
                                     AIM: MattMarshUK

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body