It might be easier to compile to a language like C so that the implementation
details
of the target processor can be handled by the C compiler. That way the
implementation
can at least initially be focussed on the implementation of the FSM.

w..


Jim Tellier wrote:

>  To handle most of what would be
> required for state machine execution in the PIC domain, I'd suggest that a
> very small common instruction subset could be employed that would "cover"
> multiple families (perhaps not "all", but what couldn't be common should be
> addressed by a "choice" of back-end module.

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body