On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, William Chops Westfield wrote:

>                                  ...  but surely we ought to be able to
> do better since we know that we're dealing with SEVEN, after all?

You mean something like this:

divby7_looped:

        clrf    y2
        comf    y2,f
        movlw   -7

L1:
        incf    y2,f
        addwf   x,f
        skpnc
         goto   L1

Not time-wise efficient. ~183 cycles worse case.

Scott

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads