On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Mike wrote: > I might give it a try. I already got one Linux programmer to modify, why not > two? The question is, even though it supports all the algorithms, how hard is > it to adapt to 16f648? Does it read the hex file and figure out where the code > and data goes? - something my old winders programmer couldn't do, though I > found one that does the 648. It does support 16f648 even if I myself have not tested that chip. It should support the following, but certainly there are some parts, especially OTP or UV erasable c parts that may have bugs. pic16c84, pic16cr83, pic16cr84, pic16f83, pic16f84, pic16f84a*, pic16f87*, pic16f88*, pic16c61, pic16c62, pic16c62a, pic16c62b, pic16c63, pic16c63a, pic16c64, pic16c64a, pic16c65, pic16c65a, pic16c65b, pic16c66, pic16c66a, pic16c67, pic16cr62, pic16cr63, pic16cr64, pic16cr65, pic16c620, pic16c620a, pic16cr620a, pic16c621, pic16c621a, pic16c622, pic16c622a, pic16f627*, pic16f627a*, pic16f628*, pic16f628a*, pic16f648a*, pic16ce623, pic16ce624, pic16ce625, pic16c641, pic16c642, pic16c661, pic16c662, pic16c71, pic16c710, pic16c711, pic16c712, pic16c715, pic16c716, pic16c717, pic16c72, pic16c72a, pic16cr72, pic16c73, pic16c73a, pic16c73b, pic16c74, pic16c74a, pic16c74b, pic16c76, pic16c77, pic16f72*, pic16f73*, pic16f74*, pic16f76*, pic16f77*, pic16c432, pic16c433, pic16c781, pic16c782, pic16c745, pic16c765, pic16c770, pic16c771, pic16c773, pic16c774, pic16f870*, pic16f871*, pic16f872*, pic16f873*, pic16f873a*, pic16f874*, pic16f874a*, pic16f876*, pic16f876a*, pic16f877*, pic16f877a*, pic16f818*, pic16f819*, pic16c923, pic16c924, pic16f630*, pic16f676*, pic12c671*, pic12c672, pic12ce673, pic12ce674, pic12f629*, pic12f675*, pic18f242*, pic18f248*, pic18f252*, pic18f258*, pic18f442*, pic18f448*, pic18f452*, pic18f458*, pic18f1220*, pic18f2220*, pic18f4220*, pic18f1320*, pic18f2320*, pic18f4320*, pic18f6520*, pic18f6620*, pic18f6720*, pic18f8520*, pic18f8620*, pic18f8720*, pic18f6585*, pic18f8585*, pic18f6680*, pic18f8680*, pic18f2515*, pic18f2525*, pic18f2585*, pic18f4515*, pic18f4525*, pic18f4585*, pic18f2610*, pic18f2620*, pic18f2680*, pic18f4610*, pic18f4620*, pic18f4680*, pic18f6525*, pic18f6621*, pic18f8525*, pic18f8621*, pic18f2439*, pic18f2539*, pic18f4439*, pic18f4539*, pic18f2331*, pic18f2431*, pic18f4331*, pic18f4431*, pic18c242, pic18c252, pic18c442, pic18c452, pic18c658, and pic18c858. The devices marked with a star (*) can be autodetected, so they need not to be specified on command line. > I think everyone should start naming their programmers with names like Jane, > Atlas, whatever. I already have "picprg", "progpic2", and your's is "picprog". > I'm already having a hard time remembering which is which :) That's true. But nobody told me 1996 that I was not the only person in the world to think that 'picprog' was a good and unique name :-) There are a couple of commercial products called Picprog too. -- Foreca Ltd Jaakko.Hyvatti@foreca.com Pursimiehenkatu 29-31 B, FIN-00150 Helsinki, Finland http://www.foreca.com -- http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu