Some months ago, I read from a web site (forget which now). It mention that an AVR have a better memory managment. When I look into their datasheet, I think the web site was right. WH Tan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wouter van Ooijen" To: Sent: 2004?2?25? 5:32 AM Subject: Re: ] Circuit Cellar contest > > Whatever useful PIC application you could find, it would be > > better done with an AVR... :-)))) > > Let's keep the smileys as flame shields. But seriously: *I* think the > opposite is true, so it balances out. > > But I can find of some specific things that are realy better done with a > PIC than with an AVR. Don't press me to give an example now, but I am > sure I can find something. And if not with a PIC than with an SX, try to > beat 75 MIPS with your lousy 16! (all PICs blushing at 10 MIPS tops, but > the 30F's are coming, maybe even this year). > > But what is realy special about AVR compared to PICs? I'm no AVR > specialist, so I am just thinking aloud. A/D with better resolution? 3 > UARTs on a cheap low-pin-count part? Fast interface to external memory? > USB interface on a flash chip? > > Wouter van Ooijen > > -- ------------------------------------------- > Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl > consultancy, development, PICmicro products > > -- > http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! > email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body -- http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu