Jamie Jensen wrote:

> Seems that banksel is the much preferred method to do this?  Any
> reason not to use it?

Hi Jamie,

Good observation and good question on your part Jamie.

I would recommend using BANKSEL and let MPASM do the grunt work for you.
Sure, one can make arguments for not using it, but I feel that if you want
safe code, definitely use BANKSEL.

I've gotten burned in the past trying to save a program word here and there
by performing "human optimized" banking myself (it hurts when it comes back
to bite you). It is always very easy to make mistakes managing banking
manually. I trust BANKSEL more than I trust myself (from making mistakes).


Best regards,

Ken Pergola

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body