So true Herb, I'm really disappointed that so many have posted this on the
[PIC:] topic. And yes, I posted my note about Olins removal on the [PIC:]
topic, but if I hadn't, people who only subscribe to it would not have
understood that children who call names get removed.

Same thing on this post.

NO MORE OLIN POSTS IN THE [PIC:] TOPIC. USE [OT:]. FINAL WARINING.


---
James.


-----Original Message-----
From: pic microcontroller discussion list [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On
Behalf Of Herbert Graf
Sent: 2004 Feb 16, Mon 12:03
To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: [PIC:] Olin YES (or NO).

> See, we didn't have to bother to state our opinions, Jan could have
> told us it was 50-50 so see we have been wasting our time. Next time
> there is an election we should just give Jan a call to find out who
> will win.

        Enough already. This is NOT within the realm of the PIC tag. If you
must continue with this pointless dribble at least make it OT, otherwise
please take it offlist.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads