---- START NEW MESSAGE ---
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109] by dpmail10.doteasy.com with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.05) id AF093B9300D8; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 11:10:01 -0800
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <5.00CC7DFC@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; 1 Feb 2004 14:09:54 -0500
Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e)
          with spool id 1702 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Sun, 1 Feb 2004
          14:09:47 -0500
Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail
          V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 1988; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 14:08:10 -0500
Received: from mta01-srv.alltel.net [166.102.165.143] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM
          SMTP Level 430) via TCP with SMTP ; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 14:08:10 EST
X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by mta01-srv.alltel.net
Received: from alltel.net ([216.170.8.157]) by mta01-srv.alltel.net with ESMTP
          id <20040201190812.ZMRV17104.mta01-srv.alltel.net@alltel.net> for
          <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 13:08:12 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.2)
            Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E1AnFjY-00051G-Th@smtp.aaisp.net.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID:  <401D4E5C.3040209@alltel.net>
Date:         Sun, 1 Feb 2004 13:07:08 -0600
Reply-To:     pic microcontroller discussion list <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sender:       pic microcontroller discussion list <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
From:         Jim Korman <jkorman@ALLTEL.NET>
Subject: Re: [OT:] Windows XP intermittent performance
To:           PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Precedence: list
X-RCPT-TO: <mailinglist2@FARCITE.NET>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 371856762

Howard Winter wrote:

> On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:05:43 +1300, Russell McMahon wrote:
>
<snip>
>>For that to be true you must read EVERY EULA that pops up during
>>installation and understand what it legally says.
>>
>
> Oh I do!  That's where I discovered that MS don't want anyone to know about the performance of .NET - you have
> to agree not to publish any benchmarks about it to install almost *anything* from MS - even things like
> security patches.
>
>
<snip>

I read that too, when installing C# on my machine. I wonder
what that means when performance and timing benchmarks are
a contract deliverable!?

Jim

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

.