---- START NEW MESSAGE ---
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109] by dpmail10.doteasy.com with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.05) id AD121BEC0068; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:51:30 -0800
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <7.00CC68E6@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:51:14 -0500
Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e)
          with spool id 9142 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Sat, 31 Jan 2004
          11:51:08 -0500
Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail
          V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 1565; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:50:46 -0500
Received: from tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.54] by mitvma.mit.edu
          (IBM VM SMTP Level 430) via TCP with SMTP ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:50:45
          EST
X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net
Received: from amd1200 ([64.231.209.178]) by tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id
          <20040131165048.LTNJ23158.tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net@amd1200> for
          <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:50:48 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID:  <NAEALEBPNOHNGKFACEHAOEAGJDAA.mailinglist2@farcite.net>
Date:         Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:50:52 -0500
Reply-To:     pic microcontroller discussion list <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sender:       pic microcontroller discussion list <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
From:         Herbert Graf <mailinglist2@FARCITE.NET>
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Hitech PICCLITE state machine optimization
To:           PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To:  <401B7B85.8080609@hccnet.nl>
Precedence: list
X-RCPT-TO: <mailinglist2@FARCITE.NET>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 371856687

> >>The point I tried to make is that if a program doesn't need to be made
> >>smaller then every effort to make it smaller is unproductive. Who wants
> >>to pay for wasted time?
> >
> >
> >         I don't want it smaller "for fun", I'm running out of
> code space (as usual)
> > have many more features I want to add. Thanks, TTYL
>
> Next time inform us about your requirements in stead of letting us guess
> and make the wrong assumptions (and wasting our time).
>
> Rob.

        Sir, yes, sir...

----------------------------------
Herbert's PIC Stuff:
http://repatch.dyndns.org:8383/pic_stuff/

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu

.