---- START NEW MESSAGE --- Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109] by dpmail10.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id ADE6D670068; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:51:02 -0800 Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <11.00CC58A4@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:50:49 -0500 Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 8612 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:50:44 -0500 Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 4864; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:50:34 -0500 Received: from mail002.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.32] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP Level 430) via TCP with ESMTP ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:50:33 EST X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by mail002.syd.optusnet.com.au Received: from deepthought (c211-30-162-155.farfl1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.162.155]) by mail002.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with SMTP id i0UNoXV11656 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:50:34 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Message-ID: <000101c3e78b$973e51a0$0c00a8c0@solar.com.au> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:48:40 +1100 Reply-To: pic microcontroller discussion list Sender: pic microcontroller discussion list From: Ian McLean Subject: Re: ] Hey admin! About topic flags... To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU In-Reply-To: <401AE66B.00000E.03800@GAIC4> Precedence: list X-RCPT-TO: Status: U X-UIDL: 371856605 Great idea Lucas ! That would stop my stupid Outlook client from dropping tags all the time. And it certainly would make mail filtering a little easier (not as many possible combo's to check for). What do you think James ? Is this feasible ? If it goes to vote, you have mine. Rgs Ian > -----Original Message----- > From: pic microcontroller discussion list > [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU]On Behalf Of Lucas Hartmann > Sent: Saturday, 31 January 2004 10:19 am > To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU > Subject: [OT:] Hey admin! About topic flags... > > > Hello, > > I'm using the Piclist for about 3 months now, and as far as I > see the [TAG:] > or [TAG]: confuses most people (I'm one). > > So, why not using just [TAG] without any colon. This will > make simpler to > everybody to set up their mail filter, and will avoid most > e-mail clients > removing the tags by confusing them with "Re:"-like tags. > > I believe that this may imply in lots of work to sort the > logged messages > however... > > What do you say? What do people say? > > Lucas Hartmann. > > -- > http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! > email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body -- http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body .