---- START NEW MESSAGE ---
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109] by dpmail10.doteasy.com with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.05) id AF9B20CE020E; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:08:43 -0800
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <17.00CC5068@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:54:27 -0500
Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e)
          with spool id 1296 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Fri, 30 Jan 2004
          11:54:20 -0500
Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail
          V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 3193; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:53:16 -0500
Received: from balin.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.155] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP
          Level 430) via TCP with ESMTP ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:53:16 EST
X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by balin.rl.ac.uk
X-RAL-MFrom: <A.B.Pearce@rl.ac.uk>
X-RAL-Connect: <sstdwkiwi.ag.rl.ac.uk [130.246.189.231]>
Received: from sstdwkiwi (sstdwkiwi.ag.rl.ac.uk [130.246.189.231]) by
          balin.rl.ac.uk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id i0UGrKVL014691 for
          <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:53:20 GMT
References:  <002701c3e750$cd98d0d0$0b00a8c0@PAARD>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-CCLRC-SPAM-report: 0 :
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
Message-ID:  <015401c3e751$8f8d5f80$e7bdf682@space.rl.ac.uk>
Date:         Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:53:18 -0000
Reply-To:     pic microcontroller discussion list <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sender:       pic microcontroller discussion list <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
From:         "Alan B. Pearce" <A.B.Pearce@RL.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Hitech PICCLITE state machine optimization
To:           PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Precedence: list
X-RCPT-TO: <mailinglist2@FARCITE.NET>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 371856525

>> there is no guarantee that a licensed compiler will produce
>> compact enough
>> code.
>
>Is it guaranteed that the OP's assembly will be compact enough?
>
>;)

Well I guess he has control over that, where he doesn't necessarily have
control over it in a HLL :))

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

.