---- START NEW MESSAGE ---
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109] by dpmail10.doteasy.com with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.05) id AF8F20CE020E; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:08:31 -0800
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <13.00CC4F05@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:48:40 -0500
Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e)
          with spool id 1174 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Fri, 30 Jan 2004
          11:48:33 -0500
Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail
          V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 3013; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:47:49 -0500
Received: from smtp-out3.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.13] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM
          SMTP Level 430) via TCP with ESMTP ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:47:48 EST
X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by smtp-out3.xs4all.nl
Received: from PAARD (a213-84-20-53.adsl.xs4all.nl [213.84.20.53]) by
          smtp-out3.xs4all.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0UGlnTf088488
          for <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:47:49 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal
Message-ID:  <002701c3e750$cd98d0d0$0b00a8c0@PAARD>
Date:         Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:47:52 +0100
Reply-To:     pic microcontroller discussion list <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sender:       pic microcontroller discussion list <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
From:         Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@VOTI.NL>
Organization: Van Ooijen Technische Informatica
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Hitech PICCLITE state machine optimization
To:           PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To:  <011201c3e74e$401eede0$e7bdf682@space.rl.ac.uk>
Precedence: list
X-RCPT-TO: <mailinglist2@FARCITE.NET>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 371856523

> I guess it comes down to which is the most cost
> effective, and
> there is no guarantee that a licensed compiler will produce
> compact enough
> code.

Is it guaranteed that the OP's assembly will be compact enough?

;)

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

.