---- START NEW MESSAGE --- Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109] by dpmail10.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A1D01F4C020E; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 03:36:48 -0800 Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <9.00CC4889@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 6:36:38 -0500 Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 6618 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:36:32 -0500 Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 5612; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:34:39 -0500 Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP Level 430) via TCP with SMTP ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:34:38 EST X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com Received: from unknown ([80.1.136.189]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20040130113418.CRDS16066.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@unknown> for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:34:18 +0000 References: <37FB7AA6F5F9814FB634A7BF4C35A6F5640D03@ESEALNT442.al.sw.ericsson.se> <00c201c3e71e$a9b432e0$7b01a8c0@Paradise> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.9/32.560 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:29:30 +0000 Reply-To: pic microcontroller discussion list Sender: pic microcontroller discussion list From: Mike Harrison Organization: White Wing Logic Subject: Re: [PIC:] Disassemblers To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU In-Reply-To: <00c201c3e71e$a9b432e0$7b01a8c0@Paradise> Precedence: list X-RCPT-TO: Status: U X-UIDL: 371856475 On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:48:55 +1300, you wrote: >> > It's a Zilog Z86, 1k of code >> >> But then, why the [PIC] tag ? > >I'd say (fwiw): > >- The original query was couched in PIC related terms. > >- It's closer to a microcontroller programming rather than EE topic and >there are no other tags that fit better than these two. A significant >proportion of people on this list who are liable to provide valuable = input >would be PIC people - even if it uses an arcane device instead of a PIC = :-) Pretty much all the (very interesting) issues under discussion would be = exactly the same if it were based on a PIC, except maybe disassembler slippage....! -- http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us! email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body .