---- START NEW MESSAGE --- Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109] by dpmail10.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A92C2CF006C; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 20:10:20 -0800 Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <17.00CC406B@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 23:10:09 -0500 Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 9048 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 23:05:19 -0500 Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 4332; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 23:03:55 -0500 Received: from *unknown [210.8.51.66] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP Level 430) via TCP with ESMTP ; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 23:03:54 EST X-Warning: mitvma.mit.edu: Host *unknown claimed to be whitlam.corp.gli.com.au Received: by whitlam.corp.gli.com.au with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <4T7L19WQ>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:06:38 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Message-ID: <2193429B07D9914D97216EBBAA6AB8BD1A0568@whitlam.corp.gli.com.au> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:06:33 +1100 Reply-To: pic microcontroller discussion list Sender: pic microcontroller discussion list From: Liam O'Hagan Subject: Re: [PIC:] Disassemblers To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU Precedence: list X-RCPT-TO: Status: U X-UIDL: 371856423 After many hours of fighting the disassember, I've located an OP Code map, and the output from the disassembler is completely incorrect! Talk about leading me up the garden path.... Now to write one. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave VanHorn [SMTP:dvanhorn@CEDAR.NET] > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 11:15 AM > To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU > Subject: Re: [PIC:] Disassemblers > > At 12:21 PM 1/30/2004 +1300, Jinx wrote: > > > It's a Zilog Z86, 1k of code > > > >Are there parts of the code that just won't disassemble or look > >strange ? It's my understanding that the Z8x has many undoc- > >umented op-codes which, without a disassembler written to do > >so, might not be reverse-engineerable back to readable code. > > Yes it does. I used to write Z8 code. > Anyone need a deal on a pair of Signum emulators? > > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different > ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details. -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details. .