---- START NEW MESSAGE --- Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109] by dpmail10.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A69297801B6; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 21:13:54 -0800 Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <19.00CC2037@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:33:43 -0500 Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 5725 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:33:36 -0500 Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 7608; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:32:22 -0500 Received: from extsmtp1.localnet.com [207.251.201.54] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP Level 430) via TCP with SMTP ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:32:22 EST X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by extsmtp1.localnet.com Received: (qmail 9596 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2004 03:58:14 -0000 Received: from thwerll.localnet.sys (HELO smtp1.localnet.com) (10.0.7.18) by extsmtp1.localnet.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2004 03:58:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 2985 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2004 04:32:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kmp) (63.246.198.227) by smtp3.localnet.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2004 04:32:20 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:32:21 -0500 Reply-To: pic microcontroller discussion list Sender: pic microcontroller discussion list From: Ken Pergola Subject: Re: [PIC:] Disassemblers To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU In-Reply-To: <2193429B07D9914D97216EBBAA6AB8BD1A0504@whitlam.corp.gli.com.au> Precedence: list X-RCPT-TO: Status: U X-UIDL: 371856212 Liam O'Hagan wrote: > ...but that was canned when it was realized it would cost a lot... Hi Liam, And just think of the litigation costs if the company ever gets solid proof on this dishonest person. I know it might sound crazy, but I wonder if the company has thought of paying the guy (and giving him immunity) to tell them how he does it -- might be cheaper in the long run. Money talks and everyone has a price. Regards, Ken Pergola -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics (like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics .